Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Is It A Good Thing To Have A Large Family?

In my last post I quoted remarks by Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod president Matt Harrison as he discussed the Biblical encouragement to "be fruitful and multiply" (Genesis 1:22). I focus today on the final sentences of that quote.
However, I think it's time for us to preach "Be fruitful and multiply." That's what the Bible says. And we ought to encourage young people and families who have the ability to have families. And encourage them. 
The church needs to be a place... It's no time to despise family ministries. It's no time to despise those kind of diakonic efforts in the church to care for marriages and families, etc. It's time to redouble our efforts in those areas and it's time to speak clearly that it's a good thing to have a large Lutheran orthodox family. If Muslims are having an average of 4.2 children a piece and we're having 2.1 children a piece, I would say God would be really happy if we'd bump it up to at least 4.2 per family. Don't quote me on that. [Laughter]
In my own life, Sylvia and I decided not to limit the number of children we would have. We were convinced that the LORD would provide. However, He declared, after a couple miscarriages, that we were to have three precious and wonderful children. We now have six grandchildren and one beautiful great-grandson. By the way, I write to and about him in another of my blogs, Dear Byron.

Contraception, the process of preventing child birth, in one form or another has been in existence for as long as humans have given birth, writes Caroline Collard. She says,
It was the ancient Greeks who first realised that male and female union caused pregnancy and since then many methods have been used with varying degrees of success. A wide range of products have been used as barriers such as lemon juice and essence from mahogany husks, acacia tree and honey, oil of cedar and lead ointment, frankincense and olive oil, salt, cabbage or willow leaves, onion juice, peppermint oil and, soft wool. Since most of these are either quite acidic or quite alkaline, it is quite likely that they all offered some degree of protection, in fact it is quite surprising how effective some of them could have been, although they would not have been as reliable as the methods that we use today. The first suppository that was commercially produced was developed in England by Walter Rendell, it was made of cocoa butter and quinine sulphate. Pessaries, suppositaries and spermicides are still in use today, unfortunately they are not the best forms available partly because they need to be inserted as near the time of intercourse as possible, this is not always easy to judge. However, they are often used in conjunction with other methods, particularly the diaphragm and as such prove quite useful. Vaginal douches have been used after intercourse since the 1600s, however, they do not seem to be at all effective.
She continues with what appears to be a carefully researched and detailed history of the subject. She concludes,
More recent methods are the injectable contraception, hormonal vaginal rings, skins patches and gels, nasal sprays, contraceptive vaccines and the male pill. Obviously research still goes in many areas and presumably always will unless the population starts to rapidly decline and there is an ever increasing range of options available which are also getting safer and more reliable. Despite this, many of the methods that have been used for many hundreds of years are still very popular and presumably will continue to be so.
For more on the history of contraception and related information see FPA, the sexual health charity of the UK.

All this takes us back to Dr. Harrison's encouragement and the question, Would God really be happy if we Lutherans bump up our conception rate to 4.2 per family like the Muslims? Frankly, I do not know how to speak for God on this matter. Dr. Harrison's remarks puzzle me, especially since I understand from Holy Scripture that children are gifts, not decisions we make to conceive. Doubtless our LORD permits us to participate in His creative activities (Genesis 1:22; 1 Cor. 3:9; 2 Cor.6:1). Does that mean He gives us the power to prevent Him from creating children? Perhaps we all need to rethink the entire question.

For today, consider this Psalm:
Children are a gift from the LORD; they are a reward from him. Children born to a young man are like arrows in a warrior's hands. How joyful is the man whose quiver is full of them! He will not be put to shame when he confronts his accusers at the city gates. - Psa 127:3-5 NLT





3 comments:

  1. My wife and I just had our second child. Adelyn Sophia Honeycutt. She and her mother are healthy. I think it is something to encourage people to see children as a blessing. Our pop American Culture, sees children as a party crasher, or something to put off until "I settle down" which has left many couples with regrets about the problems of fertility and not to mention some of the harmful side effects that certain "birth control" methods have on the female body. We should not be pushing the pill on our daughters, and in my opinion the morning after pill is not a form of contraception at all, more of a chemical abortion.

    I found Mark Driscoll's chapter on birth control enlightening, from his recent book on marriage, "Real Marriage."

    I hesitate the encouragement of a number of 4.2, I encourage couples to talk about it, and both be on the same page, also pray about your family planning. God speaks to us, if we can just stop and listen to Him, He will give us insights.

    That is what I believe.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think we can assume that Pres. Harrison's directive to bump up to 4.2 children can be taken as tongue in cheek. But what he's saying is important: be open to large families. No one ever told me that. It is still very rare to hear from Lutherans. It is still much more common to hear Lutheran pastors balk at the idea that birth control, or even so-called "family planning" might not be what is intended by "Children are a gift from the Lord". Did he really say?...under the guise of stewardship, Gospel freedom, etc.
    My husband and I are on the same path as you and Sylvia, Al. We have two children now. Maybe that's all we get. Maybe we get 6. We are blessed indeed and look forward to seeing what He has intended for our family. (Though sometimes I think 2.1 would be the most merciful number...)

    Thanks for all your posts.
    Ellee.

    ReplyDelete
  3. In any and every event, our children are indeed a blessing and heritage from the LORD. And now we have their children to love. And even their children's child, our first Great-Grandson. What wonders! What blessings indeed! We join all parents to thank our LORD for His gracious love and look forward to celebrating eternity with our children.

    ReplyDelete

So what do you think? I would love to see a few words from you.