Showing posts with label technology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label technology. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 11, 2012

The Singularity And The Day Of Judgment

From a human viewpoint, I am alive because of the advances in medical knowledge and technology. In the past four years I have been operated upon twice by surgeons. The first was to bypass the blocked arteries feeding my heart with a procedure is called CABG or coronary artery bypass graft and pronounced "cabbage". A couple years after that operation another group of surgeons replaced my heart's aortic valve with a procedure known as TAVR, trans-aortic valve replacement. Without these surgeries I would very likely be dead. I have heart disease!

Advances in other medical technologies are proceeding at a rapid pace. Today, in some instances, surgeons don’t need to even be in the room to conduct a surgical operation. Recent innovations in robotics have produced machines like the Da Vinci surgical system and the Kymerax, which offer precise, mechanical tools that a surgeon operates remotely. These machines also feature helpful options like 3-D imaging and on-the-fly magnification of the surgical area—though they still require a living, breathing person to operate them.

As I pointed out in my previous blog there are those who believe that since these and similar advancements are proceeding at an exponential rate, with our intelligence and knowledge doubling every few years, scientists will eventually complete the reverse-engineering of the human brain. This will mark the Singularity. The Singularity is the technological creation of smarter-than-human intelligence. It also describes the moment when our civilization will change so much that its rules and technologies will be incomprehensible to all previous generations. That's why we are at a loss to adequately describe it. At that point men will be able to download all their information into a computer network capable of reproducing themselves. The singularitarians will no longer need biological bodies. They will become "post-biological" humans, capable of constantly upgrading their software and their hardware. They will be immortal! 

We Christians who believe in God's judgment upon rebellious mankind and Christ's redemption upon the cross of Calvary, have barely begun to address this challenge to our faith. My own search of the Internet reveals a marked paucity of entries by Christians ready to address these issues. This is why I appeal to any Christian reading these words to step forward. Speak up! And, if you find it appropriate, contact me as well. 

I humbly suggest several approaches: 
  • We are created beings, not the product of mindless evolution. The theory of evolution is a gross deception. 
  • We humans are unique, made in the Image of God. We are not mere biological animals with superior intelligence. 
  • We who bear God's image have God's command to subdue and rule over His creation. 
  • Consequently we do not resist advances in science and technology, but welcome them as gifts to be used properly to bless mankind and care for God's creation. 
  • However, we are by nature rebellious and disobedient to our Creator and so readily fall into the temptation to use our technologies for self-centered ends.  
  • There are other super-intelligent, spiritual beings encouraging us to use our technology and science to join their rebellion against the Creator and to destroy one another.   
  • Christ, God's Son, came into this world as a human to take our place under God's judgment and to rescue us from God's judgment upon this rebellion.
  • Given new birth by the working of the Holy Spirit, we put our trust in Christ and seek to honor Him in all we say and do—also in the use of our technologies. 
  • We also await Christ's imminent return when all will be called before God's judgment seat to give an accounting of how we have used all that He placed in our hands. 
  • The hubris of the Singularity is a sign that Christ's return is indeed imminent.
In future postings I will spell out these responses in more detail. I welcome and encourage other Christians to join me. The Singularity may be approaching, but so is the Day of Judgment.


Monday, December 10, 2012

Immortality Through Technology Is Still On The Horizon

It is the season of Advent as I write. We are busy preparing to celebrate again the birth of our Lord Jesus. As we make such preparations, we are also reminded about those who do not have the means to celebrate. Churches and various non-profit organizations appeal to us on behalf of the poor, the sick and the homeless. We Christians also pray to our Lord to rescue and restore them. And this he does—often through us, the members of his body (Rom. 7:4).

One such prayer reached Jesus (John 11:1-3). Two wealthy women of the village of Bethany, beloved friends of Jesus, appealed to him on behalf of their brother Lazarus. He was deathly sick and no matter how wealthy they were, they were helpless in the face of his illness. They needed Jesus, the Great Physician (Luke 5:31) who had healed many (Matt. 8:16; 12:15; 14:14, etc.). Jesus responded to their prayer in a strange manner.
But when Jesus heard it he said, "This illness does not lead to death. It is for the glory of God, so that the Son of God may be glorified through it." Now Jesus loved Martha and her sister and Lazarus. So, when he heard that Lazarus was ill, he stayed two days longer in the place where he was. - John 11:4-6 ESV
I call this response strange, because Lazarus did die. His illness did lead to death. However, it did glorify Jesus, the Son of God, as he raised Lazarus from the dead. An important question arises at this point. What death or what type of death is Jesus speaking about? Its an important question, because modern science now suggests that we are in sight of conquering both illness and death within the next generation. And if that is so, we won't need Jesus any longer.

Here's a quote from the Postive Futurist:
Cutting-edge science and technologies, experts say, will one day provide everyone with radically increased intelligence, futuristic healthcare that prevents sickness and disease from ever happening, and a lifespan approaching immortality. . . 
Futurist Ray Kurzweil, in The Singularity is Near predicts that between 2025 and 2030, nanobot "cell-repair machines” will cruise through our bodies to prevent aging and stop pathogens before they cause harm. Nanobots will reprogram DNA where necessary keeping us forever young and in perfect health. . . 
In the 2040s, our 100% non-biological body will boast a zero failure rate. Even if a destructive accident were to occur, molecular nanotech would immediately construct a new body, retrieve our mind and memories, and allow life to continue; dying would be about as disruptive as a bee sting, and would take even less time to forget it even happened. 
Can this "magical future” without death become reality? This positive futurist believes it can!
Actually, I've examined this future in previous blogs over a year ago.
  • Fear Not, The Technium Will Save Us! 
  • Ray Kurzweil, MIT graduate, futurist and inventor believes that we're approaching a moment when computers will become . . . more intelligent than humans and that science will ultimately discover the causes of biological death and eliminate them. . . Information defines your personality, your memories, your skills. And it really is information. And we ultimately will be able to capture that and actually recreate it. So then we will back ourselves up.
Michael Lindvall, a theologian and pastor of Brick Presbyterian Church in New York, pegs Mr. Kurzweil’s Singularity dogma as a modern iteration of the Gnosticism prevalent in the second and third centuries.
Gnosticism “was basically the idea that people save themselves by being smart,” Mr. Lindvall said. “By knowing these secret things, you would become cognoscenti, one of the few, elitist. Gnostics looked down on the hoi polloi Christian masses.”
As you may have guessed, Kurzweil and his followers are atheists. They don't need any God. Their technology is their god. So we are back to the days of the tower of Babel and human hubris.
Now the whole earth had one language and the same words. And as people migrated from the east, they found a plain in the land of Shinar and settled there. And they said to one another, "Come, let us make bricks, and burn them thoroughly." And they had brick for stone, and bitumen for mortar. Then they said, "Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be dispersed over the face of the whole earth." And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of man had built. And the LORD said, "Behold, they are one people, and they have all one language, and this is only the beginning of what they will do. And nothing that they propose to do will now be impossible for them. - Gen 11:1-6 ESV
More on this in my next post.








Monday, June 13, 2011

Immortality Through Science And Technology

We who honor historical Christian worship practices have just completed our celebration of Easter and Christ's resurrection from the dead. Last Sunday we celebrated the festival of Pentecost and the outpouring of the Holy Spirit. Empowered by that Spirit, we believe we are sent out into the world with the message that Christ offered his perfect life for all mankind and thereby rescued us from the power of sin and death. He is risen and we who believe in him already have his life within us, a life that will never end. When Christ returns He will also grant us immortal bodies in a renewed creation (cf. Romans 8:9-34; 1 Corinthians 15:12-58). However, before that happens we must accept the hard fact that we will all die. Even though we already share his eternal life, our bodies, corrupted by sin, remain under the curse of death (John 11:23-27). There is no alternative.

However—and this fascinates me—a sizable group of humanistic-oriented scientists believe there is indeed an alternative. They need no Christ nor good news about some distant resurrection and renewal. They are working to bring mankind immortality through science and technology now! I want to acquaint you in more detail with the building of this new tower of Babel (Genesis 11:1-9), with what they assert. I hinted at this in one of my recent blogs. The basic claim:

  • The singularity approaches. Many alive today will finally see death conquered by human science and technology. Immortality is within our grasp within the next 35 years! 
How should a Christian respond? For today let's consider what these scientists are saying. 


The main proponent for the 2045 singularity event is Ray Kurzweil. Time, in a February 10, 2011 article, says Kurzweil "believes that we're approaching a moment when computers will become intelligent, and not just intelligent but more intelligent than humans. When that happens, humanity—our bodies, our minds, our civilization—will be completely and irreversibly transformed. He believes that this moment is not only inevitable but imminent. According to his calculations, the end of human civilization as we know it is about 35 years away."

The Immortality Institute claims that science is already increasing human longevity and ultimately will discover the causes of biological death and eliminate them. They argue for more funding for longevity research since slowing down aging will stop many diseases before they occur. They believe the aging process is modifiable, that it can be decelerated. In turn that discovery will dramatically delay and lower the incidence of chronic disease and achieve a much longer health-span for us all. Could it ultimately even bring human immortality? Yes, yes, yes!

Fight Aging! insists, "We stand on the verge of a revolution in medicine: understanding, treating, and ultimately preventing the causes of degenerative aging." One posted article on that site quotes Ray Kurzweil and Dr. Terry Grossman in  Fantastic Voyage: Live Long Enough to Live Forever. Kurzweil and Grossman conclude:

"In our modern era of abundance, all generations can contribute to the ongoing expansion of human knowledge. Our life expectancy will be in the region on 5,000 years ... by the year 2100. By following the three bridges described in Fantastic Voyage, you should be able to reach the year 2100, and then, according to Aubrey de Grey (Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence), extend your longevity indefinitely" (italics added).
Do your own research. The internet is packed with sites and related claims. How naive and out of touch are we Christians who claim that only Christ can and will conquer death. Stay tuned. We may have finally discovered Ponce deLeon's mythical fountain of youth!

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

Fear Not, The Technium Will Save Us!

Do you enjoy getting confused? If so, read on. Today's blog will certainly satisfy your taste.

I recently received a book from my son Nathan. He said he had just finished it and wanted me to read it. And so I have been doing just that this past week. My, oh my, oh my. The book is What Technology Wants by Kevin Kelly.

In his daily blog, The Technium,  Kelly writes, 
"I've promised that my recent book, What Technology Wants, will be my last paper-native book. From now on my new books will be born digital. At the same time I am trying to move my existing books into as many ebook formats as possible. I am discovering this is easier said than done. Standards are slippery, conversion tools are sloppy, and there is much hand crafting and tweaking needed. . . "
I am about 1/3 through the paper edition of Kelly's book and struggling. As I read along I inevitably find myself asking, Who or what is this guy's 'god'? Chance? Luck? Technology? Evolution? Homo Sapiens? Natural law? Philosophy? Progress? The universe? Information? Science? Reason? The collective mind? Yes. All of it, wrapped up in what he calls the technium.

He bounces all over the place. One dare not look to him for a consistent use of language and terms or carefully defined meanings. I'm more than confused by what it is he is trying to say.  His terms have assumptions built into them, but they are slippery. He is an atheistic evolutionist who believes in a god called chance or luck. . . And yet, and yet, and yet he, he, he seems to believe in some kind of inevitable progress as promoted by the philosopher Hegel and the old communists. He also speaks about the immaterial and transcendence in an almost spiritual manner. I gather that the technium,  that greater, global, massively interconnected system of technology vibrating around us, is that immaterial something that will reverse the inevitable movement toward entropy—the winding down of the universe. Something called exotropy will ultimately save it all—I guess.

Note the use of verbs like evolve, create, make, generate, reveal and nouns like luck, chance, reality, progress, trend, transcendence. There is a philosophy, a belief system, even a theology lurking there. Examples: 
". . . all living species have evolved from predecessors for the same amount of time: four billion years ago." 
". . . hydrogen atoms . . . were created in the fires of the big bang and dispersed into the universe as a uniform warm mist." 
"One day, in a stroke of luck, the water molecule is captured by a chain of unusually active carbons in one pool." 
"As the universe stretched out, it made nothingness. As emptiness increased, so did coolness." 
". . . we don't really know what information is. . . more metaphor than anything else."
"Matter . . . generated gravity . . . The informational process we call life took control of the atmosphere of Earth several billion years ago." 
"The creation of language was the first singularity for humans. . . A few scientists believe that, in fact, it was technology that sparked language." 
"Our genes have co-evolved with our inventions." 
"Progress, even moral progress, is ultimately a human invention."
"We can view the long-term trajectory of exotropy as an escape from the material and a transcendence into the immaterial." 
"Martin Heidegger suggested that technology was an "unhiding"—a revealing—of an inner reality. That inner reality is the immaterial nature of anything manufactured." 
(Does he really know who Heidegger—who loved the Nazis— was or what he wrote? A large chunk of Plato and Aristotle lurks here as well)
"I think there are five pools of evidence for this trend (toward betterment). . . 1) the long-term rise in longevity, education, health and wealth of an average person . . . 2) . . . the obvious wave of positive technological development we have witnessed in our lifetimes. . . 3) . . . advance resides in the moral sphere. . . 4) . . . the immense distance life has traveled in its four billion-year journey from extremely simple organisms to extremely complex and social animals . . . 5) . . the rush toward urbanization. 
"Simultaneous, independent invention seems to be the rule in nature. . . In both realms, natural evolution and technological evolution, convergence creates inevitabilities. _______________
I could go on, but this is enough. In analyzing anyone's writing one must ask two questions about his guiding philosophy or theology:
1. What is his formal principle? 
2. What is his material principle? 
So far, I have only read the first 120 pages, but it is sufficient. His formal principle, that which guides, instructs and informs him, is science, atheistic philosophy and human reason. His material principle, what he believes is happening, is progress and an escape into the infinite immaterial reality. 

I pop to the end for a couple final quotes: 

"In his mythic book The Singularity Is Near  Ray Kurzweil, serial inventor, technology enthusiast, and unabashed atheist, announces: "Evolution moves toward greater complexity, greater elegance, greater knowledge, greater beauty, greater creativity, and greater levels of subtle attributes such as love. In every monotheistic tradition God is likewise described as all of these qualities, only without limitation . . . So evolution moves inexorably toward this conception of God, although never quite reaching this ideal." 

"If there is a God, the arc of the technium is aimed right at him . . . Look what is coming: Technology is stitching together all the minds of the living, wrapping the planet in a vibrating cloak of electronic nerves, entire continents of machines conversing with one another, the whole aggregation watching itself through a million cameras posted daily. How can this not stir that organ in us that is sensitive to something larger than ourselves? 

". . . Technology amplifies the mind's urge toward the unity of all thought, it accelerates the connection among all people, and it will populate the world with all conceivable ways of comprehending the infinite . . . more options, more opportunities, more connection, more diversity, more unity, more thought, more beautiy, and more problems. Those add up to more good, an infinite game worth playing.

"That's what technology wants." 
_______________________
So now you know: God's name is Technology or as Kelly calls it, the Technium. And before this infinite, hidden, transcendent good we bow in awesome wonder!  The Singularity is closing in upon us. The day is coming when the technium's ability to alter us will exceed our ability to alter the technium.

Amen. Hallelu-Technium! Come save us and the universe. 








Thursday, May 20, 2010

THE DAY OF REST - Chapter One

The Day of Rest
Biblical Teaching About Time
— An online book about rest and worship—
By Dr. Al Franzmeier
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Chapter One - How The World Has Changed
Something called modernism flourished from the end of the nineteenth century to end of the World War II. It was an exciting time. Writers, teachers, philosophers, theologians and politicians proclaimed old ways at an end as new, modern, progressive ways opened up. The industrial, mechanized age was here to stay and it was good. Quantum and relativistic physics, analytical philosophy and the new number theory in mathematics appeared on the scene. Little did we realize at the time what implications were embedded in those breakthroughs. As the twentieth century progressed many thinkers rebelled against nineteenth century academic and historicist traditions. Immutable laws no longer govern historical events, they insisted. Traditional forms of art, architecture, literature, religious faith, social organization and daily life became outdated. Modern industry changed our economics as well as the social and political aspects of our lives.

I draw on the experiences of my birth family to illustrate. We lived on a farm of about two hundred acres in the southern part of Minnesota. My father had inherited the farm when Grandpa died. Grandma continued to live with us until her nineties when she moved into a nursing home where she lived on to the ripe old age of one hundred one.

My uncles, aunts and other relatives lived on farms all around. In my early youth we used a team of workhorses to plow and plant the fields and harvest the hay, but then we got our first tractor. Eventually we sold off the horses.  We were traditional, old school type people, but times were changing. Our farms were becoming mechanized. These were modern times—also for farmers. Each spring Grandma and Mother planted a huge garden from which they harvested all of our vegetables for eating and canning. They watched over a flock of three hundred chickens and roosters that provided us with eggs and meat—and with a weekly mess to clean up, my job as a boy.

Farm life was like that. Everybody, including we children, had chores. We grew most of our food and took care of ourselves. When necessary, we bought staples like flour and salt from a local store. Since we were a dairy farm, we always had plenty of milk, butter and cheese, processed by a local co-op. But in the thirties we started milking our cows with machines and lighting our barn with electricity. These were modern times.

Telephones were very primitive in those days. Our family’s first was installed in my grandparents’ house. One turned a crank on the side of a wooden box to reach another party. A bell rang and sent a signal alerting the operator to connect us. We didn’t necessarily need her since each family on the party line was already assigned a unique ring. Our ring was three short bells and a long. To reach our neighbor we could simply pick up the earpiece, ring their signal and, when they answered, start talking. That also meant that any or all of us on the line could listen or join in the conversation as well. We were one big neighborhood, tied together by the magic of the telephone. These were modern times.

We also had radios. Mother had a small maroon, plastic one on top of the refrigerator in our kitchen. She won it at a raffle at the general store down the road. She loved to listen to soap operas, country music and news on her radio. I vividly recall how we clustered around Mother’s radio to hear reports of Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor that infamous first week in December, 1941.  The next week President Roosevelt shocked our nation by announcing over the same radio that we were at war with both Japan and Germany. The marvel of modern communications brought us immediate, but frightening news from the other side of the world. These were modern times.

The war changed our little rural community—as well as to our nation. A few years into that it the federal government began to build a munitions plant on hundreds of acres of former farmland adjoining the western boundaries of our farm. The Federal Government’s Department of Defense confiscated the land from families we all knew. Day after day we watched the plant’s huge smoke stacks go up. Farmers who formerly lived there were paid for their houses, barns and acreage, but had to find new farms or new ways of making a living. Some went to work in the plant. These were modern times.

In the tiny entryway of our country church we hung banners with stars representing our young men in the armed forces. A couple years into it, the war became personal. My cousin Godon, an air force bombardier, was killed in a raid over Germany when his B-17 Flying Fortress bomber was shot down. Gordon was about ten years older than I. I hardly knew him. My Aunt Grace never quite recovered from his death. He was her only child and she took it very hard. Our parents warned us children not to talk about Gordon in Aunt Grace’s presence. In World War II our nation lost over 175,000 soldiers and sailors with over 450,000 casualties. These were modern times.

When World War II ended, we could not go back to the way things were before. World War II was a defining moment for our community and in our nation’s history. The rural, agricultural way of life I knew as a child began to wan. The urbanizing, industrial age changed it all. Modern times were becoming postmodern.

After the war the world of technology moved in and the pace of life quickened.  Jet airplanes began to fly overhead. Black and white TV became a big hit. The Beatles and Elvis shook up the establishment with their wild music. The whole world began to rock and roll, but not only to the new music.  Sounds of change were everywhere. Month after month hundreds of changes dropped into our lives. Things were changing so fast we lost count. It was exciting and scary all at the same time. Modernism was ending. Postmodernism was beginning.

The postmodern bureaucratic, technological society
The burgeoning postmodern technology changed how and where we lived. Life on the family farm slipped away as big corporate farms sprang up, cultivating thousands of acres, milking hundreds of cows and feeding hundreds of pigs and beef cattle. My mother used to send me out to the chicken coop to collect a dozen eggs from our half-dozen hen nests. On these corporate farms chickens were now raised in air-conditioned barns by the thousands. Eggs, wings, legs and thighs were now processed, packaged and forwarded to supermarkets around the nation. Postmodern times brought relentless change.

Advances in communication technology were a large part of the change. Today we call our friends and relatives in New York, Wisconsin, south Texas or Idaho easier than we used to call neighbors on our party line a mile down the road. We make phone calls over the Internet, using VOIP (voice-over-Internet-provider) technology. Cell phones are ubiquitous, used not only for conversations, but also to access the Internet, monitor our schedules, send text messages and manage photo images.

I write these words on a computer. I do my banking and most of my correspondence on a computer. We can no longer function without computers. As a consequence, we’ve had to learn a new set of abbreviations like RUP, CD, DSL, DVD, HDTV, ISP, HTML and hundreds more. We’re supposed to know about power conditioners, broadband access, bitmapped images, cookies, dithering, compact flash drives, shock ratings, firewall flaming, page hosting, hypertext, ISA buses, wiki, JavaScript, log-in name, Lotus notes, boot sequences, RSS feeds, WiFi and spanning tree protocols. These are postmodern times.

In this new, postmodern world, information and data are big business, making twenty-five year olds into billionaires. We are both empowered and engulfed by information and information technologies. A while back I bought a nostalgic CD recording of Judy Garland’s hits from the 1930’s and 40’s, called ‘Over the Rainbow,’ from a store in London I found on eBay, the great online trading place. I paid for it on a secure site with my MasterCard. The CD arrived at my doorstep ten days later by United Parcel.

There’s nothing strange about that. We do it all the time. Yet who even buys CDs anymore? The music industry is scared. Now we download music directly from the Internet. These are postmodern times.

Needless to say, computers and the Internet have had a profound effect upon postmodern life, but the changes are not at an end. In ten years we’ll wonder how we ever got along with today’s primitive equipment. Some suggest that in a generation artificially intelligent computers will merge with humans to form a new species. Already we have moved beyond what a single computer can do, regardless of its size. Multiple independent computing clusters act over the Internet as a grid composed of resource nodes, located within many administrative domains. Thus the power of computing is increased manifold.

Who can adjust to the exponential rate of change in twenty-first century life? Who can even track it? Many in my generation no longer try. For several I know, even learning to operate computers is too challenging. On the other hand, our grandchildren grow up playing on and working with computers from their earliest years, to say nothing of cell phones, I-Pods, X-Boxes and who knows what else.  It’s all a part of our ever-changing lives.

Oh, excuse me. My cell phone is ringing. I see also on my phone’s readout that my son is calling from Denmark. He’s over there on business for his globally based company. I had better answer him. I also see I have a couple text messages. Interesting. My wife expects me for dinner in ten minutes. Here’s another note reminding me of an appointment with my dentist tomorrow morning.

We can pick up this conversation later when I post the second chapter.

Monday, October 5, 2009

Creating Reality With Words

We viewed the latest Bruce Willis flick, Surrogates, last night. While the movie had the usual shoot-em-up and save the world plot we've come to expect from Willis, I cannot say I was very impressed. I walked away with ten questions about how the plot does not hang together.


Anyway, what got me going is how this relates to the work of a novelist. We do not have access to the technology to simulate a world that allows users to interact with that environment. Most current virtual reality environments are primarily visual experiences, with some advanced ones offering added auditory and even tactile information. In Willis's Surrogate world all senses are engaged as the surrogates interact in place of the humans, who remain safely on a couch in their homes receiving feedback.


So what does the writer have to work with? Words, only words. We create words in endless combinations so as to evoke a response from you, the reader. We use words to take you into this reality that we are creating. We depend upon your imagination and your experience of reality to evoke an emotional response.


Consider the following excerpt from my next novel, Freya's Child. It is a crisp fall night, shortly before midnight. We are deep in the woods of northern Minnesota, watching Hulda, the Wiccan Priestess perform a mystical rite to call forth a response from the gods. What is your response to the scene?


At the final circle on the west Hulda drew a fourth pentacle and  paused, searching the darkness of the forest. “Give me the heart and liver,” she commanded. 
Al unfolded the bloody leather pouch and handed the organs to her. His hands were sticky from the congealed blood on the organs and their pouch. The smell nauseated him. With the heart in her right and the liver in her left, she resumed her previous keening. Her shrill voice echoed through the woods and bounced back from the lake. Higher and higher rose her singing until Al thought his head would burst from the sounds entering his ears. Again he fell to his knees, trembling so violently he could not control his limbs. Tears poured from his eyes and spittle from his mouth. 
Suddenly a large black shape appeared at the edge of the clearing. It was a bear, undoubtedly the one to whom the cave belonged. It growled and moaned and growled again as it rose on its back feet to a height of eight or more feet. Al could see huge, wretched claws extended from the great paws, but was frozen where he was. At some level he was aware he was soaking his pants with his own urine, but was completely unable to do anything about it. 
The bear advanced toward the motionless Völva. As it approached she stopped her shrill singing and fell to her knees to place the deer’s bloody organs in the middle of the circle. The bear dropped back to all four feet and padded silently to the circle. In two swift gulps it devoured first the heart and then the liver. Then, licking its chops, it made a strange moan as it came nose to nose with Hulda. She did not move. After a few seconds, the animal backed away and bent down to grasp the deer rump with its powerful jaws. Whining, it turned away from Hulda’s circle with the deer meat in its mouth, padded to its cave and disappeared into the inner darkness.


As I said, all we have to work with are words.